It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 8:39 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Tell me about Valve Springs. I know the basics of what they are and what they do. But I want the whole story.

What's good seat pressure for typical street applications?
What's not enough to prevent float?
What's too much which wears out guides and seats?

There's also the point where the spring is either producing too much pressure OR it binds. You need to make sure that the spring chosen doesn't bind at the lifts your cam and rockers will push the valve. I've always heard that stock springs bind right at or shortly after .500". First off is that TRUE or can stock springs frequently go higher than .500" before bind? Will changing the retainers on stock springs improve this or does that weaken their seat pressure?

Aftermarket springs don't bind until well above that. Can I rely on most all aftermarket springs binding at closer to .600" or higher? Or do some bind earlier?

I get that springs increase in pressure when pressed. So there's a compression when the valve is closed that produces a seat pressure. If you aren't getting a strong enough seat pressure, you can shim to increase the seat pressure. But what if the seat pressure is too high? Does that mean the wrong springs are installed and I need to get different springs or do I machine the spring landings on the head down to relieve some of the seat pressure (opposite of shimming)?

And spring diameter, is there any value in larger diameter springs?

What are the typical mods to stock heads to support/handle aftermarket springs? I've heard there is machine work sometimes needed, but I've never gotten clear description as to what that work is, where the work is done, and why.

Are springs the same across vendors? Looking on some sites, I see where some springs are being sold as Ford, Chevy, and Mopar Springs. Are they selling 3 different springs or is the same spring commonly capable of being used on different mfg of stock heads?

And retainers...what's wrong with stock retainers that people recommend aftermarket valve retainers when running high lift cams and aftermarket springs?

I'd like to collect enough info from various people and possibly websites that I can write a Tech Doc all about Valve Springs. This will be an educational experience for me as well as me collecting and saving what I learn for myself and others to reference in the future. So give me all the details. But clarify whether your details are general rule-of-thumb, based on experience that worked, based on some other source (cite the source if its a website), or just what you've heard.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
And on top of all those questions why do so many people think you need a ton of extra spring pressure with boosted motors?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sat May 01, 2010 5:49 pm 
Offline
Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:23 am
Posts: 260
Location: Mn
unfortunately, I think a lot of what some people recommend comes from what they have, or what they have heard others parrot. I wish I knew how to figure that stuff out, but I don't. What I do know is:
Beehive springs are better than standard springs. They have lower weight at the valve end, and their design allows for better properties around the board.

personally I've asked for different retainers and locks to cut valvetrain weight. Otherwise it is a question of if the stock components are known to be an issue or not. If not and they work with the valves, I don't know why you would go away from stock.

My motor and heads was built for 20+psi and ability to run at 6500rpm easily. My seat pressure is 140lbs, open 305lbs.

_________________
93 Ford Tbird SC 5speed 3.8l (441hp/462tq) V6 2.0l autorotor 80lb/hr injectors. Valves 1.84I/1.57E CAM: 218 in 224 ex lift is .555/.555 114 lobe sep, Rhoads VMAX lifters, stud mounted adjustable rockers. 9:1CR Forged Wiseco custom pistons, Scat 6.2" (long) H-Beam Rods. 75mm throttle body, 80mm C&L MAF (ford factory electronics) Snow Methanol Injection ; Liquid/Air intercooler; Moates QH 1.6; BE 2010; Innovate LM1 & AuxBox


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 9:05 am 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:42 pm
Posts: 567
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
My take on all of this is: It depends on the cam and what you're doing with the engine. Here is what I know for sure.

Coil bind height is straightforward to measure. It's the point at which the windings of the spring stack solid. The valve lift at this height can be increased by extending the spring's installed height with a different retainer or thinner shims... but then you have lower seat pressure.

Boosted engines do in fact need more intake seat pressure, to resist the larger manifold pressure and keep the valve under control on the intake stroke.

Bigger cams need more spring pressure, all else being equal. Higher RPMs require more spring pressure likewise. The opening and closing ramp rates and the RPM combined with the weight of the various components (lifter, pushrod, rocker, valve & retainer) dictate how much spring pressure you really need.

Cam material is a limiting factor in how much spring pressure you can run. Most cheap aftermarket hydraulic roller cams - and some custom grinds - are made from "selectively austempered ductile iron" (SADI) which is nowhere near as strong as billet steel. SADI cams won't withstand as much spring pressure.

The rest of your questions would be best answered by someone who actually knows about this stuff. I'd go to sbftech.com, grit your teeth at the "STFU NOOB" tone of the discussions, get in the minimum 10 posts to see the serious tech areas of the board, and study, study, study.

One of the relevant things I've learned from sbftech.com, and my own experience, is that modifying stock heads in any way is a total waste of money. Get the biggest and best aftermarket heads you can and you'll be bucks and speed ahead.

_________________
'89 LX 5.0, Crane 2040, Pro-M 80 mm, 65 mm TB, ported stock intake & E7TE heads, 24 lb injs., JBA shortys, cat X-pipe, A3M1 (GUFB strategy) w/Moates Quarterhorse, BE & EA, close ratio T5Z, 3.55 rear


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 9:33 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
For my own purposes, I'm looking into exactly what spring I need for a VERY mild 331 build I have on perpetual planning. It'll be a high torque, low RPM N/A build. It'll keep the stock GT40p heads, but ported. Also run the stock Explorer upper/lower, but with the lower ported. 331 bottom end obviously. And a mild, but high lift cam. The cams I'm looking at all have pretty aggressive ramp rates. Although the intent for this engine is to be a well built daily driver that won't get above 2500 RPMs most days. On the occasional WOT blast, it'll probably have a shift-point around 5500 RPMs, and rarely if ever, will touch 6000, but I'd like a spring that can support 6000 RPMs in case the build ends up being stronger than I'm anticipating at those RPMs. I'd hate to think I have potential HP above 5500 that I can't get at because I kept stock/stock-like springs. But being this is a daily driver engine, I am far more interested in longevity and durability than max HP, so I would gladly sacrifice the 5500-6000 RPM range if running a weaker valve spring guaranteed me that doing so would improve the longevity potential of the engine.

But before I make a decision, I just thought I'd ask around, get opinions, references, experiences, and explanations from people that might give my efforts to find answers some direction. And while I was doing the research & askings around, I thought I'd collect what I'd learned and put together a Tech Doc that covered all the various aspects of what you need to know about valve springs, retainers, and sizing.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:54 pm 
Offline
Regular

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:13 am
Posts: 114
Location: Lexington, SC
One of the best sources of information on anything valve train related is the Comp Cams catalog. It can be downloaded as a .pdf and it has technical info on every facet of the valvetrain. It's definitely worth taking a look.

Jonathan

_________________
1989 Mustang LX (former SC State Patrol)
408w with GT40Y heads, Victor 5.8 EFI intake, Comp Cams XFI 236HR-14, 42lb/hr injectors, 90mm Lightning MAF, 75mm throttle body, BBK CAI, BBK 1 3/4" LT headers, Moates QH, BE and EA, Innovate LC-1, Smog pump and EGR removed, No PCV (baffled, open breathers on valve covers), MSD 6AL ignition, Stock A9L computer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:30 am 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:04 pm
Posts: 626
Location: East Peoria, IL
I think Chucko hit it pretty well on the head.

For your application, supposing you won't be going too high on life, a good stock replacement dual spring would probably do well for you. Most kits should tell you right on them how much lift they support. This kit also lists seat pressures as well. ex:
http://www.competitionproducts.com/CP-R ... info/VSA5/

On race engines, It's also important to regularly change your springs. I'd also recommend titanium retainers. This is for high RPM, high lift engines (lower RPM/lift is fine with chrome moly). We change valve springs after 20-30 nights, or pretty much every rebuild. Dropping a valve is much more expensive than a set of springs, so can look at it as "insurance" money spent.

_________________
1978 Mustang II King Cobra
89 5.0HO, Stock Short Block, Edelbrock 4bbl aluminum intake, Holley 650 double pumper, MSD 6AL, Ford F303 cam, 1.7:1 Crane Roller Rockers, Pocket Ported stock heads, Hedman Long Tube Headers
5 spd Manual
Full roll cage, 9" full floater w/Currie trac lock/373 gears, RCI Fuel Cell
Project Page: http://www.brandttuning.com/projects.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:42 pm
Posts: 567
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Coincidentally this topic just came up at SBFtech.com: http://sbftech.com/index.php/topic,25606.0.html

When Jay Allen talks about valvetrain stuff, I listen. Enjoy!

_________________
'89 LX 5.0, Crane 2040, Pro-M 80 mm, 65 mm TB, ported stock intake & E7TE heads, 24 lb injs., JBA shortys, cat X-pipe, A3M1 (GUFB strategy) w/Moates Quarterhorse, BE & EA, close ratio T5Z, 3.55 rear


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
That's interesting that boost pressure needs to be taken into account when sizing valve springs.

Although they touched on an exhaust valve detail I found interesting after the Turbo Talk we just got done with, but they never followed up on it. I can see how you might need a stronger spring on the intake valve since the boost pressure might be holding the valve open longer than you want or at the very least preventing the valve from closing as fast as it would otherwise at high RPMs.

But on the exhaust side, you have a double-whammy. After the power stroke, there is a butt-load of exhaust just needing a way to get out. The way valves are designed, that pressure is actually holding the exhaust valve shut. This means the lobe, lifter, and rocker must overcome that enormous pressure in order to budge the exhaust valve enough to start relieving the pressure that's in the cylinder. So to ease the burden on the exhaust valvetrain, should you reduce the seat pressure on the exhaust valve for supercharged engines? Increasing the seat pressure just adds insult to injury when the engine is at high RPM boost conditions and the exhaust valvetrain has to overcome both a higher seat pressure as well as VERY high pressures in the cylinder. I'm thinking you opt for a spring with a more aggressive spring rate so you can get the 300+lbs you need when the valve is full open...but set it to relieve that pressure to a lower weight when the valve is on the seat.

But as was mentioned in the thread, the pressure in the ports on a turbo-charged engine is higher than the pressure in the intake. So for these, you'd need the stronger spring for the same reasons you need the stronger spring on the intake...to make sure the valve closes tight when it is supposed to. For these applications, the valvetrain will just have to suck it up and deal.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:16 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
I don't have a login on that site and don't care to join. What are they saying about adding spring pressure for boost?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:30 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
In a nutshell, it was recommended that you add twice the pressure of your boost. So if you have 15 PSI boost, you increase your spring pressure by 30. So if you have 100 seat pressure, you'd want 130lbs of seat pressure to make sure you get at least 100lbs on the seat WITH max boost. It wasn't indicated why it's x2 and not a 1-for-1.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 7:44 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
Why is it assumed that seat pressure is compromised by boost? When the intake valve is closing shouldn't the pressure on both sides of the valve be the same?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 8:03 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
While closing, that's the case. But right after it closes, there's supposedly this period of potential vulnerability at high RPMs where the air pressure can float the valve easier. Once on the compression, power, and exhaust stroke, it should no longer be an issue. I think the spring pressure issue is a bit overstated particularly if you are building for sub-6000RPMs. It's only a concern for people pushing into the 7000s.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 8:13 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
cgrey8 wrote:
While closing, that's the case. But right after it closes, there's supposedly this period of potential vulnerability at high RPMs where the air pressure can float the valve easier. Once on the compression, power, and exhaust stroke, it should no longer be an issue. I think the spring pressure issue is a bit overstated particularly if you are building for sub-6000RPMs. It's only a concern for people pushing into the 7000s.


interesting, that would support what I have heard which is don't worry about extra spring pressure in most cases. In the other cases (what these cases are I have not seen or been told) you just need to add 20-30 pounds and all is good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
Amateur Tooner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 5954
Location: New Orleans, LA
oh boy oh boy oh boy, i think i have some useful information i could add here but i think i'll hold my tongue this time

:|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
Lets hear it. I am open to learning something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:04 pm 
Offline
Amateur Tooner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 5954
Location: New Orleans, LA
alright I'll play

for those of you that don't already know my background:

R&D Speed Shop is a dedicated Engine Machine Shop located in the Greater New Orleans Kenner area. Since 1958 we have acquired a notorious track record that speaks for itself. From building 6 second drag strip dominators for the all out racer, to factory spec rebuilds for the local Ford, Chevrolet, BMW, Mercedez, Toyota-Lexus, or Cadillac dealerships, we have the knowledge and hands on experience to exceed your expectations. We pride ourselves in the value of being a true SPEC shop, which means we build your engine the way you want to meet your specifications, to ultimately provide you with the most appropriate engine to reach your specific goals. Our motto is that "EVERY ENGINE IS DIFFERENT" and by applying this motto to every build, we continue to be a true SPEC shop. This mentality coupled with our many satisfied customers, has enabled R&D to be one of the most highly regarded Engine Machine Shops around. This comes to no surprised since the majority of our business is from recommendations.

now since that's out the way, what im about to type has been passed down to me from generation to generation I'll try to explain everything as thorough as i possibly can, if anyone has any questions DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK, If its not evident yet, my sole purpose on this forum is to help others and learn along the way, although it seems I do more of the first part, I can't possibly begin to even repay what I've gathered from this site. I'll try to tackle everything starting from Chris's original post on down.

the amount of seat pressure you need is determined primarily by the cam, valve weight, rate, and profile

usually the seat pressure is going to be determined by the cam grinder

you typically loose about 10% of your spring pressure when you get up to operating temperature just from the thermal expansion

if you setup for 150# on the seat when you get up to operating temp your going to drop down to about 135# on the seat just by the heat, but cam grinders will take this into account when they recommend a seat pressure

ex: if your only going to be spinning up to 6k, it takes a certain amount of energy to operate you motor, nascar goes on a basis of (14.98%) 15% of parasitic losses, but you can even go further than that on an all out drag motor

reducing parasitic losses will increase hp, moving from 15% to 10% PL on a 600hp engine is going to net you an increase of about 30hp

this is why they have new technology for rings, pistons, oils, springs, design in crankshafts, everything today is aimed towards less PL and less parasitic drag

Grumpy Jenkins, has seen as much as 8 degrees of torsional twist on a sbc camshaft from high spring rates and loads on the cam shaft, distributor, oil pump, etc.. which effects cam timing and ignition timing

you'll see on newer engines the oil pumps are run off the front of the engine instead of the cam just to help reduce this torsional offset

new valve technology with smaller seats, 7mm or 8mm valve stems, beehive springs with their progressive rates, smaller retainers, and lighter parts, are aimed at less PL because its all basically free hp

now just for example:
the standard performance hydraulic cam for big block chevy engines come with 140-150# on the seat and 350# over the nose

the big valve 572ci 620hp engines with the 'hot' hyd cams come with 180# OTS / 370# OTN, reason being
is that the bigger valve needs more seat pressure to control it at higher revs

if you keep the seat pressure at a lower ratings of ~145# OTS with more valve-train weight, the results aren't going to be to good, since you don't have enough pressure to keep that valve closed at those upper rpms, you'll get valve flutter "float", which will cause the motor to just lay over

when you see an engine that just lays over or runs out of breath that's usually because of valve float

application specific, if your going to run a supercharger, turbo, or nitrous, you will run more seat pressure, the width of the seat is going to determine the amount of pressure, using a wider seat may require more pressure than a thinner seat because your not pressing down as hard

imagine putting your hand on a hot plate, then image putting it down on a hot pin at the same temp, you have a higher load value in that area in a smaller seat so that actually pulls more heat out since you don't have as much area, but that also depends on where you put the seat, cuz if you put the seat all the way out by the margin your actually making a bigger surface area or a larger surface area which then may or may not require more seat pressure depending on the width of the seat, there's a whole bunch of factors, we're just getting into the minutia of the intricacies of knowing whats available

that was kind of technical, so here's another comparison
if you have a hot frying pan on the stove and touch it lightly for 1.2 seconds, it'll probably give you a burn, but if you touch the same spot for the same 1.2 seconds but this time you push hard on it, you will probably blister your finger just because the pressure removed more heat which was transferred to your finger. now try it using your whole palm, the more you can now understand how the surface area is going to come into play

reminds anyone of the turbo thread? lol

now since i know Chris is wondering about that 331 lets put everything into perspective
a 331 making about 400hp :biggrin: with a mild cam at .500 lift through a hydraulic roller that spins up to about 6k which is where i figured he would want to be, we would put him right at 125-140# seat / 330-350# OTN with the gt40 heads although that won't cut 400hp, for that kind of power you'll probably want a good set of trickflows or even better the RHS heads which come with 140 OTS

now depending on cam selection and valve-train weight that may shift just a little tad but that's typically where we would want to see you at

now if i was building a 331 that i wanted to make 400+hp on a hyd cam, i would be looking to lighten up the valve-train with a cylinder head that can keep the air speed as high as possible, not necessarily the most volume, you want a head thats properly sized which is going to be around the 240-260cfm range

ex: 300 cfm N/A with the right CR, has the potential of making 2hp per cfm, this is just a ball park estimate there's a bit of factoring you need to do for VE but it should have the capacity to make close to 600hp in all honesty

the heads on my friends engine flowed 320cfm and he maked 606hp... and he has a very small cam, he can easily crank out 650+ just by simply swapping the cam

likewise too little seat pressure will cause valve float, to explain better i have the perfect example, well technically I actually have 6 lol

the ford thunderbird supercoupe made from 89-95 with a 3.8L V6 and Eaton m90 supercharger making 210 or 230 hp.

At around 5200 rpms they make a complete nose-dive and loose power, now with a supercharger that shouldn't happen, as long as you have the efficiency to back it, a blown engine should keep pulling, 5200 rpms is nowhere near where it should stop making power, much less have a huge decrease in power

the reason being is that Henry only sprung her with ~80# OTS / 230# OTN, with the valve-train weighing in at a massive 230 grams :shock: that's nowhere near the seat pressure that's needed to seat her, you can conclude that at those upper rpm's the valve isn't going to seat, just by swapping the springs over to 120# OTS I can now make power all the way up to 6500 rpms where as before at 5200 the engine wasn't going anywhere fast

VT comparison on the supercoupe
230g = OEM valve, spring, and retainer
170g = new valve, spring, and retainer
that's 60 grams lighter which allows me to spin higher so in return i picked up 40hp just by being able to spin it higher, and then i picked up another 50hp by the bigger valves :lol:

also keep in mind more seat pressure will remove more heat or better yet transfer that heat from the valve to the seat then dissipate that to the head and so on...

a more practical example of valve-train weight is the LS7 heads which will give you an idea of how valve-train weight is going to be a large factor in determining the seat pressure needed, the stock titanium intake valve and sodium filled lightweight exhaust valve only require 110# OTS due to being so lightweight, keep in mind we're referring to hydraulic cams. But because the valve-train is so lightweight it doesn't require as much spring tension to control the valve and they spin past 7k

as for the gt40 heads and the stock springs handling .500 lift, no way after about .420 there done.

but any who, the traditional coil spring is old technology compared to beehives, the great properties that beehive springs offer is that they have minimal weight by design, and they have much more controllable spring rates they have dynamic (progressive) spring rates rather than linear rates of older style traditional springs, so its a win-win, this is why you see beehives equipped on all new OEM engines.

moving on to retainers, weight as well as design is going to effect both the seat pressure and the amount of pressure on the seat needed to keep it seated at high rev's

the stock retainer on gt40 head is a POS, its got a cup on it that holds the keepers in place and the rotator cup its just heavy that thing is junk

yes you can shim to get increased seat pressure, you can also go with a different retainer design that has a shorter installed height so more tension is on the seat thus increasing seat pressure.

if you have too much seat pressure, there's a few options you have, although the best and usually most practical would be to get a different spring, but you can go with a deep dish retainer that will give you a higher install height, or you can swap the valves to longer ones, also some companies make drop retainers and drop keepers

keep in mind all of this should be done by a professional not for the dim-witted :roll:

on stock gt40 heads the spring isn't as restrictive as the valve, the biggest gains you'll see from a stock gt40 head is doing a valve job and opening up the ports, keep in mind that a very smooth and fine intake port is not ideal and will hurt performance but im not going to get into head porting and what not, the stock ford heads have a crappy valve job to being with its just garbage, it needs one desperately i mean bad!

we have some guys that run 11.90s with gt40 heads and we charge about $600 to do a set of them, you'll then have a decent head that Henry would even approve of, it'll pull to 6200 rpms and includes new seals, valves, retainers, guides, keepers, beehive springs, 5 angle valve job, resurface, bowl work, bronze wall guides, minimal porting, EVERYTHING.

we can actually do you a whole 331 long block using your block and heads fully machined and built for around $3 grand
that includes the cam rockers pushrods everything for the long block if you stayed at 302 you could save about $500

if your guides aren't worn you could put a set of 5/16 bronze wall guides stab it then broach it, then hone it to 8mm stick an ls valve in it, you'll have a lightweight valve-train ls3 1.86 intake valve and 1.55 exhaust valve, thats what i would recommend for gt40s

springs are springs, just like a valve is a valve, they usually list what they were originally designed for but that doesn't mean that's the only thing it will fit, that's just more so for reference.

there is some truth to extra spring pressure needed for boost,

example if you have 20# of boost and you have 2 sq in of surface area on your valve at 20# your going to have 40# pushing on that valve, so now your pushing against the valve when it closes

that extra pressure is going to want to hang that intake valve open, so its going to negate some of that spring pressure if that makes any sense

on the exhaust valve you don't have the same pressure behind it so its really not a problem, but you want to keep the same seat pressure on the exhaust that you want on the intake

visualize the VT in motion, the intake is opening as the piston is coming up, so you need good seat pressure so when the intake valve starts closing, you won't have PTV issues 'during the overlap

while the exhaust valve is closing the piston is chasing the valve, so that's where you need really good over the nose pressure because you don't want the valve floating there because if it comes off the lobe that's when you run into a PTV issue, don't get me wrong their both important but that's where its really important

if you float the intake valve your not really gonna worry about it hitting there unless you run into a lot of valve bounce, your more worried about floating the exhaust, usually you end up hitting the exhaust valve which comes around and hits the intake valve and messes everything up

if your trying to set the national record or if you just want a daily driver that you don't have to wrench on everyday, let the engine builder know, if you tell them you want all out power, be prepared to work on your car, because if your out racing that means your pushing the limit so things will break, if you want it reliable then get what you can and don't try to push the limits of where those parts are expected to live, be honest with yourself and the builder, dreams of going fast cost money, and don't lie to the engine builder it really makes things difficult for us and in the end you probably won't be satisfied with the results.

hope this helps


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:12 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
That's all a good review and some interesting examples. My only problem is I'm not seeing a formula of how to figure what the ideal valve spring is based on RPM, valve weight, seat surface area (guesstimated from valve diameter), etc. I'm sure on your end, the numbers in your example are derived from something (formula, what someone told you, experience of what works, etc). But all your numbers for seat/nose pressures are just numbers that I can't confirm or derive for myself. To use an analogy, I don't want to be fed fish from someone that knows how to fish, I want to learn to fish for myself. That doesn't mean I need to be a fully vested expert engine builder with all the toys and techniques. I just want to know how to build a decent engine and know when someone is spewing BS or not.

On with more specific thoughts about your comments...

decipha wrote:
...the amount of seat pressure you need is determined primarily by the cam, valve weight, rate, and profile

usually the seat pressure is going to be determined by the cam grinder...
How does the cam grinder come up with this?

decipha wrote:
...if your only going to be spinning up to 6k, it takes a certain amount of energy to operate you motor, nascar goes on a basis of (14.98%) 15% of parasitic losses, but you can even go further than that on an all out drag motor

reducing parasitic losses will increase hp, moving from 15% to 10% PL on a 600hp engine is going to net you an increase of about 30hp

this is why they have new technology for rings, pistons, oils, springs, design in crankshafts, everything today is aimed towards less PL and less parasitic drag...
I am far more interested in these kinds of tricks, but not so much for getting max power, but for getting max efficiency for the purposes of optimal fuel economy. Thus things that improve performance at 4500+RPMs and have little to no benefit at 1200-2000 RPMs are not things I'm going to seriously consider for my build...but I'm still interested in knowing what improvements are available, how they improve things, and when they are best applied. Not to mention, those kinds of details would be interesting for others here that ARE interested in performance gains through PL reduction.

decipha wrote:
...new valve technology with smaller seats, 7mm or 8mm valve stems, beehive springs with their progressive rates, smaller retainers, and lighter parts, are aimed at less PL because its all basically free hp...
The beehives are really that much better? ...even for sub 3000 RPM ranges on an N/A daily driven machine? If so, I'm sold. Is there any chance that the beehive technology will afford me less seat pressure or some other efficiency gain?

decipha wrote:
...now since i know Chris is wondering about that 331 lets put everything into perspective
a 331 making about 400hp :biggrin: with a mild cam at .500 lift through a hydraulic roller that spins up to about 6k which is where i figured he would want to be, we would put him right at 125-140# seat / 330-350# OTN with the gt40 heads although that won't cut 400hp, for that kind of power you'll probably want a good set of trickflows or even better the RHS heads which come with 140 OTS

now depending on cam selection and valve-train weight that may shift just a little tad but that's typically where we would want to see you at...
400hp would be WAY optimistic for what I have in mind...as you recognized. I'm thinking more along the lines of 300hp for what I'm wanting to do. And what I'll be using are Explorer GT40p heads, not the GT40 heads. I'm also wanting:
  • Tight quench with a .030" head gasket.
  • High compression (10.2-10.7 range to make good use of E85, but low enough to still run 93 octane premium when I have to). I'd love to think I could run 11:1 with these cast iron heads, but from what I understand, that's just not going to happen, even with 93 octane, although it would be about perfect for E85.
  • Mild port and bowl work (mostly cleanup) on the heads as described on Mouse's DIY Porting Site: DIY GT40p Head Porting. There's lots of good tips about what to and what NOT to do to GT40p heads based on testing he's done on his flow bench. His examples probably won't yield the absolue best gains possible with GT40p heads, but they will certainly be better than leaving them in stock form.
  • Port work on the Explorer/GT40 lower as described by the Tech Docs from Tom Moss (available in the Tech Docs section of this forum).
  • Cam hasn't been selected, but its either a Crane Powermax 2020 (.530"i/.530"e), a Comp XE258HR (.533"i/.544"e), or an RM Competition custom grind that's about the same duration and event points as those, just less lift (.512"i/.508"e). All three are basically RV/Truck cams, not performance cams. But because they all have high lifts and fast ramp rates, they can produce impressively well into the 5000s considering what they are.


Ultimately, if I got everything exactly right and accidentally got 350hp, I'd be pickled tink! But realistically, I'm not expecting more than about 300hp on pump gas...maybe 325hp with E85. Although I would like to think I could improve my fuel economy over what it is with a 150kmile Explorer 302 engine tuned for 87 octane.

decipha wrote:
...now if i was building a 331 that i wanted to make 400+hp on a hyd cam, i would be looking to lighten up the valve-train with a cylinder head that can keep the air speed as high as possible, not necessarily the most volume, you want a head thats properly sized which is going to be around the 240-260cfm range...
I don't think GT40p heads have a prayer in hell of getting that high of a flowrate even if I reground the seats and installed 2.02"/1.60" values and did the best port job anyone's ever seen done to a stock cast iron head. And even if they did, I wouldn't bother. I'd just buy new heads. The main reason I want/need to stick with the GT40p heads is I know they fit my engine bay without modification to crap under the hood. Ideally, I'd like to reuse the stock Explorer valve covers. See, in a Ranger up to 94, the AC box is butted right up next to the engine and even with a 100% stock V8, the AC box must be notched to clear the valve cover. I did the minimal amount of notching possible to maintain as much airflow as I can through the box. If I have to raise the height of the valve cover or if the head raises any, I have to revisit that mod and take a bigger chunk out. This is what a Ranger AC box looks like:
Image

This is typical of the amount of chunk that has to be removed when you have aftermarket heads and valve covers:
Image

Image


Here's what I was able to do with my stock Explorer engine:
Image

Image

Like I said, I'd like to avoid revisiting that box hence why I'd really like to avoid changing the heads or valve cover...if I can.


decipha wrote:
...as for the gt40 heads and the stock springs handling .500 lift, no way after about .420 there done.

but any who, the traditional coil spring is old technology compared to beehives, the great properties that beehive springs offer is that they have minimal weight by design, and they have much more controllable spring rates they have dynamic (progressive) spring rates rather than linear rates of older style traditional springs, so its a win-win, this is why you see beehives equipped on all new OEM engines.

moving on to retainers, weight as well as design is going to effect both the seat pressure and the amount of pressure on the seat needed to keep it seated at high rev's

the stock retainer on gt40 head is a POS, its got a cup on it that holds the keepers in place and the rotator cup its just heavy that thing is junk...
So ditch the retainers and springs. Any recommendations on a specific spring? Or at least seat/nose pressures I should aim for given the above info? All along, I've been assuming I'd be in the 100-120lb seat/300lb max lift range. And being I'm interested in efficiency, I was wanting to be on the low end. I'll sacrifice the 5500-6000RPM range if that'll give me the potential of more longevity OR better fuel economy.

decipha wrote:
...on stock gt40 heads the spring isn't as restrictive as the valve, the biggest gains you'll see from a stock gt40 head is doing a valve job and opening up the ports, keep in mind that a very smooth and fine intake port is not ideal and will hurt performance but im not going to get into head porting and what not, the stock ford heads have a crappy valve job to being with its just garbage, it needs one desperately i mean bad!...
After porting the heads, the plan was to get the head work done such as new valve guides (whether they need them or not), 3-5 angle Valve Job (depending on difference in cost), and back-cut the intake valve .050" at 31° as most people say is a larger-than-typical gain on the valves Ford put in the Explorer GT40p head, and thus well worth doing.

decipha wrote:
...there is some truth to extra spring pressure needed for boost,

example if you have 20# of boost and you have 2 sq in of surface area on your valve at 20# your going to have 40# pushing on that valve, so now your pushing against the valve when it closes

that extra pressure is going to want to hang that intake valve open, so its going to negate some of that spring pressure if that makes any sense...
And I agreed. That does make sense assuming there is the point of vulnerability right as the valve is closing where the pressure on both sides of the valve can be significantly different. Although how much different will it ever be? I don't know. I expect that has to do with how well the head flows, at what RPM you are talking about, and the ramp rate of the cam near the intake close event. A restrictive port/valve could increase this window of vulnerability where an aftermarket head, even with a bigger valve (more surface area), might produce far less differential since the cylinder can fill easier, thus reducing the vulnerability. This is definitely an area where most of us DIY tuners just don't have the money to go R&Ding this kind of info so you most people go the safe route and increase the seat pressure using rule-of-thumb formulas that seem to work pretty good most of the time. Or they can ignore it, cross their fingers, and accept the possible negative results as educational.

decipha wrote:
...on the exhaust valve you don't have the same pressure behind it so its really not a problem, but you want to keep the same seat pressure on the exhaust that you want on the intake...
That assumes it's NA or supercharged. In the turbo discussion, it was made pretty clear that if you are producing 15 PSI in the intake, there's way more than 15 PSI being produced between the engine and turbo on the exhaust side. So exhaust valves on turbos DO experience high back pressures like an intake valve does while under boost. Fortunately the exhaust valve is smaller (less surface area) so that helps. But if turbo exhaust pressures are more than 3-4x intake boost pressures, having higher seat pressures on the exhaust valve is more important for turbo guys. Without a feel for exactly what the exhaust back-pressure PSI is, I couldn't begin to guess what the real need here is. But I do believe it important to be aware of.

decipha wrote:
...if you want it reliable then get what you can and don't try to push the limits of where those parts are expected to live, be honest with yourself and the builder...
I don't think 300hp from a 331 is unreasonable to expect to be reliable as long as I do things like upgrade the valve springs and retainers. Expecting stock valvetrain components to lift to .500"+ is probably asking for trouble hence why I'm planning on new valve springs, retainers, and 1.6RRs. I just need to know what's adequate given my intentions.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline
Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 8:18 am
Posts: 294
Location: Rockledge, FL
Outstanding tech guys...

_________________
Turning screws on a Holley 4180c these days...

My Hooptie: '85 GT. Just about bone stock and knocks down 24 on the highway... LONG LIVE 7.5's and 2.73's!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:51 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
Interesting stuff. You have spawned me and my brother to develop a few excel spreadsheets worth of equations to determine the effects of each part of the valvetrain system on valve spring requirements. The one thing I am very curious about right now is how much the spring pressure changes due to seat width.

Two minor things for the moment though, the oil pump now being driven off the crank was not as much a cam deflection decision as much as a packaging one. It's hard to turn an oil pump with a distributor that does not exist. Now, I am not saying cam twist is not an issue as the last redesign of the chevy nascar motor moved the distributor to the front of the motor due to that very fact. It gave them more consistent spark timing to every cylinder as well as slightly reducing cam twist. Oil pumps where not a factor in that decision as the motors are dry sump setups.


The other is that while you talked about the valve side of things, retainer, keepers, valve, you didn't really touch on the lifter and pushrod which are also important factors when talking springs and valvetrain. Heavier lifters vs lighter which usually just manifests itself as hydraulic vs solid and pushrod wall thickness and diameter which have an affect on pushrod flex due to spring pressure among other things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 9:22 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
While talking about valve springs, I guess it is only natural to also discuss the various valve spring compressors. Just looking around on eBay and on YouTube, it seems they are varied. Some are simple pieces of bent sheet metal that bolt to the head and make a lever to push down on the spring. Others are big C-clamp things with and without quick-action levers. There was even one video on YouTube where a guy was showing that hitting a valve with a hammer would jar the keepers out and fling all the pieces everywhere. I have to believe that was more a joke than something serious. It just doesn't look like safe for the hardware or anybody in the immediate area...not to mention having to search all over for the pieces.

So what are the real advantages of each? I'm assuming some work best with heads on the engine. Others work best with the heads on a bench. Some are just cheap and slow regardless. To those that have used various valve spring compressors, what are your takes on each? Don't forget to differentiate between "usefulness" as it relates to both professionals that do this on a regular basis and DIYers that build an engine once every few years, if more than once in their life.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 4:16 pm 
Offline
Regular

Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:23 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Cartersville,Ga
Heads off the car......Use the C-clamp style. In my opinion those are the way to go. Mine is a 50 year piece that was given to me. Works great!
Heads on the car......You have to use the lever type or one of those crappy things Advanced Auto sells that grabs the spring and pulls it toward the retainer. Does ok for single spring setups, but not so good on double springs.

And actually the socket and hammer trick is no joke. Ive seen some mechanics use this method. Hell I even tried just because. But when you need a face shield to protect yourself from flying valve train parts, it makes it undesirable. And half of the time, you wind up missing the locks and once they fly across the shop, you will almost never find them........

_________________
89 Coupe- Canfield 195's, Holley Systemax II, CI cam, 24# Inj, 05 Slot MAF, 75mm TB
BBK 1 3/4 LT's, 3"Exhaust, 3"Spintech's, T-5 Trans, QH 1.4, AEM WB, BE/EA: A9L-GUFB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:38 am 
Offline
Amateur Tooner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 5954
Location: New Orleans, LA
man i don't really know of any formula to calculate spring pressure needed, i just know 'what works' from experience, i want to say cam grinders go by 'gut' as well but I can't say for certain

yes beehives are really that much better, its worth it

I want to say that seat pressure isn't going to effect mpg much if at all really, it is additional friction to an extent but I highly doubt it can be measured in mpg's

300rwhp from a 331ci engine is very reasonable

10.5:1 should be more than enough for your goals

Given what you stated above I'd put you at 130 seat 330 over the nose
any lower and you'll be sacrificing upper rpm for really no gain

x2 on the clamp spring compressor, no other way

cougar... I'll take some measurements, what do you want specs on specifically?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Tuning Addict

Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 1061
Location: Michigan
I've got plenty of parts here and at the shop to measure, just need to find the time to do it all. I am planning on measuring up a set of big block chevy heads when I get time and compare the affect of seat width on the larger valves to my modular heads. Hell, If I ever get a minute I'll probably run around the shop with a set of calipers and measure up every cylinder head I can get my hands on. :lol:

What I have found playing around for a few minutes with an exhaust valve out of my motor (4.6 sohc) was that the difference from the smallest to widest practical seat width was only about 10psi. I think that is hardly worth worrying about myself but really makes me wonder on larger valve heads. Time to measure up a set of Big Chiefs.......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:11 pm 
Offline
Gear Head

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 51
decipha wrote:
imagine putting your hand on a hot plate, then image putting it down on a hot pin at the same temp, you have a higher load value in that area in a smaller seat so that actually pulls more heat out since you don't have as much area, but that also depends on where you put the seat, cuz if you put the seat all the way out by the margin your actually making a bigger surface area or a larger surface area which then may or may not require more seat pressure depending on the width of the seat, there's a whole bunch of factors, we're just getting into the minutia of the intricacies of knowing whats available

that was kind of technical, so here's another comparison
if you have a hot frying pan on the stove and touch it lightly for 1.2 seconds, it'll probably give you a burn, but if you touch the same spot for the same 1.2 seconds but this time you push hard on it, you will probably blister your finger just because the pressure removed more heat which was transferred to your finger. now try it using your whole palm, the more you can now understand how the surface area is going to come into play


I'm not entirely sure of the point that was being made above, so the statements may be accurate with regard to how decipha meant them; but from an engineering point of view - pressure has nothing to do with conductive heat transfer between two solids.

The rate of heat transfer due to conduction in one deminsion is described by Fourier's law which tells us that the rate of heat transfer is based on the area, the thermal conductivity of the two materials and the difference in temperature between them. That's it.

I will grant that if you are pushing your thumb into a hot plate, your skin will deform and more area will end up on the hot plate and you'll get a bigger burn; but our exhaust valves are not substantially deforming with 140# of closed seat pressure.

And I will also grant that the seat on the head and the cuts on the valve are not touching perfectly on a micro-scopic level and that there are undoubtedly small areas where convection is transfering heat; but again, 140# of pressure will not deform the valve or seat such that these areas are lessened.

Good luck...

_________________
1966 Mustang
5.0 EFI Swap
Ported GT-40 Heads
1.6 Roller Rockers
Edelbrock RPM Intake
E-cam
76mm C&L MAF (blue tube)
70mm Edelbrock TB
24 lb injectors
Tri-Y Headers
T-5
3.55 Gears

A3M, QH, BE/EA
No Emissions Equipment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:40 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Here's an easy one. When looking around for valve spring/retainer kits, what angle keepers work with stock valves? Or does the angle have more to do with the keeper's relationship to the retainer than the valve? From my looking around, it seems there are 7° and 10° keepers. Assuming the choice is more of preference than of fitment, what are the pros and cons of each?

And what is the typical install height of springs in Ford heads? It's important to know the install height to gauge what the seat pressure will be for a given spring. From what I'm finding in looking at springs on the Interwebs, mfgs assume an install height of 1.800" and advertise seat pressure based on that. Is that close enough or is that a Chevy number that must be adjusted to get seat pressure values on a Ford? Obviously I'm most interested in what stock GT40p spring install height is. But is it always the same for unmodified Ford heads (both stock and aftermarket)?

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
Amateur Tooner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 5954
Location: New Orleans, LA
phutch... Fourier's law is how heat disperses within a solid object, that doesn't apply here since we're talking about the second law of thermodynamics which relates to heat exchange from one mass to another.

I think you misunderstood the relationship of seat pressure and heat transfer, the more seat pressure the more heat that is pulled OUT of the valve and TRANSFERRED to the head, where it can be cooled by the cooling system, you know the radiator and what not.

chris, your head stock came with a 7 degree 11/32 keeper

1.8 is just an idea so you know where to adjust for your desired pressure rates, if you come out to 1.83 and you need the pressures that spring is spec'd for, then you know you'll need to stuff a .030 shim in there to get your desired pressure

its not technical, it's just math

stock ford heads and aftermarket heads aren't going to have the same installed height, usually most of the aftermarket sbf heads have the installed height about same though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 4:25 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
How did the 2nd law get invoked in a question about keeper angle and typical install height for springs? Besides this engine won't be running nearly hot enough to worry about dissipation of exhaust valve heat...at least I don't expect it to be. I associate "hot valve syndrome" on boosted engines with big duration cams where combustion temps go way up there and the exhaust valve is floating out in the middle of the blazes of hell for extended periods of time.

You did sort of answer what I was wanting to know with indicating install height might be 1.83. But ultimately what I really was after was an idea of typical install height to expect for unmodified stock heads. And if there are different install heights for different heads (i.e. are GT40p typical install heights the same as E7s). Also how much does install height deviate from valve to valve on the same head? Should they be in the +/-.005 range or are deviations of +/-.200" not unheard of? I'm not looking for complicated answers...just answers that can only come from those experienced in dealing with valvetrains.

I guess the most important question is how important is it to get a specific install height? Is a variance of 10lbs from valve to valve on the seat acceptable or is that unreasonable? If it is crucial to get right, then an idea of the best way to measure installed height might also be a good thing to know. I can envision anything from using a ruler to an end micrometer. But since I don't have a feel for how dead-on each valve needs to be, I thought I'd ask. I expect a picture is worth 1000 words to answer this one. I'm sure it's simple, I just want to get an idea as to whether install height is important, and if it is what tolerance is acceptable?

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
Amateur Tooner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 5954
Location: New Orleans, LA
yeah pretty much all the ford stock sbf heads run the same height

Henry does crappy valve jobs from the factory I don't remember what the installed height is off the top of my head, I want to say its either 1.7 or 1.75 on the stock heads, usually they should all be within about .020 of each other though from the factory

aftermarket heads are usually done by one man sitting at a machine doing one at a time, where as at the factory they use 4 cutters and punch them all in at once so aftermarket heads are going to be much closer than stock, it's typical to see about .005-.010 on an aftermarket head

its actually rated as a percentage you want all your valve springs to be within about 10% of each other, if the recommended MINIMUM seat pressure is 80# OTS then you want at least 80#, if you have 82# on one or two thats fine, but not less than what they recommend

Comp makes a tool that goes between the keeper and the base, that's what we use, works like a charm

you should run either a locator or a cup on all your springs especially if you run a damper they're usually made of hardened steel but most importantly the locator holds the spring in place and centers off the guide

ex: if you have a .660 OD guide and a locator with a .670 ID, [.010 - .015 interference] that critical to keeping the harmonics right on the spring, setting that up and having a good snug fit on the retainer is really important, that and a set of tight keepers, if the keepers are loose they're worn and your gonna have an issue, THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT and is often overlooked

a 7 degree keeper or a super 7 keeper gives you a tighter swedge than a 10 deg keeper, the keeper locks on tighter with the 7 rather than the 10, the 7 is a wider keeper than the 10 so it gets a better grip on the valve so to speak

also bead lock keepers are better than the straight edge keeper since it has a round edge instead of a square edge, square edges dig in, round edges don't, plain and simple

hope this helps


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Valve Spring Talk
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 6:35 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 9397
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
That's more along the lines of what I was looking for.

_________________
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, 1.6RRs, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, Slot Style MAF, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', 8.8" rear w/3.27s, Powertrax Locker, Innovate LC-1, GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group