Would you guys consider this a high overlap cam? I did some calculations and at 050 lift, I had a -1 degree of overlap. This number sounds to me like I do not have a high overlap cam. However it's certianly doesn't act like it and is pretty "loapy". I'm using 1.7 RRs too.
Comp Cam 284H-R14
Moderators: EDS50, cgrey8, 2Shaker, Jon 94GT
Is my cam grind considered "high overlap"
1994 Ford Mustang, Explorer 302 shortblock, TFS TW 170s, TF street burner intake, Comp Cam 1.7 RR, Comp Cam 284H-R14, Stock MAF & intake, Walbro 255lph pump
-
decipha
Re: Is my cam grind considered "high overlap"
calculate the actual crank degrees that the valve is cracked using the .006 number
Re: Is my cam grind considered "high overlap"
at 0.006:
59 degrees
This is based off of:
intake: 284
exhaust: 290
LSA: 114
59 degrees
This is based off of:
intake: 284
exhaust: 290
LSA: 114
1994 Ford Mustang, Explorer 302 shortblock, TFS TW 170s, TF street burner intake, Comp Cam 1.7 RR, Comp Cam 284H-R14, Stock MAF & intake, Walbro 255lph pump
-
decipha
Re: Is my cam grind considered "high overlap"
no thats not high overlap thats about common for most off the shelf sbf cams maybe even a touch less
i would consider high overlap to be in the 70+ range
i would consider high overlap to be in the 70+ range
Re: Is my cam grind considered "high overlap"
That said, would you expect that I would have the capabilities to dial in fuel at idle? I.e. matching lambse and feedback?
1994 Ford Mustang, Explorer 302 shortblock, TFS TW 170s, TF street burner intake, Comp Cam 1.7 RR, Comp Cam 284H-R14, Stock MAF & intake, Walbro 255lph pump
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 29 guests