Anything about Ford EEC tuning. TwEECer and Moates questions dominate, but there's some SCT and OBD-II knowledge too.

Moderators: EDS50, cgrey8, 2Shaker, Jon 94GT

Scaffy
Regular
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by Scaffy » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:37 am

sprint347 wrote:
Scaffy wrote:
sprint347 wrote:I've put it off long enough... the TwEECer is GONE and the QH is in the mail!
Shane, is that you? Or is there another tough Sprint being built, somewhere in Australia? 2DCA would be what you're running?
There does seem to be alot of Sprints out there these days, but yes it's me.

I'm finally listening to what you guys have been saying for years, I'm pretty keen to see how good the EEC is for a turbo combo using a QH and wideband.
Have a chat to decipha about that. I'm pretty sure he's made bulk power with this gear on more than one occasion with turbo setups.
STREETBUILT RACING

Aussie 302w [YEAH NAH] EL XR8 with Trick Flow top end kit, 70mm tb, 73mm maf, 24lb injectors, tweecer, 3.73s & tired T5 = 275rwhp & 13.155@105mph NA. 12.375@116.73 N2O

3700lb with driver

Strategy - NVMG84 EEC - 6DFC

User avatar
auIILTD
Gear Head
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by auIILTD » Sun Dec 23, 2012 3:30 am

Hi All.

Just thought that 12 months down the track, I would provide an update.

Engine and tune are performing fabulously. My tuning progression not so fabulously. It is ok, just want to know more!

In June, I took the car and myself down the quarter mile for the first time ever. Ran a 14.20 at 100.18 with the car in full street trim @ around 4500 lb. Using this as a tuning experience, found out that it was running quite rich at around 12.0 afr. My first real tune of my own corrected this to around 12.8, but I have not yet run another quarter. Hoping to break into the 13s when I do make it to the strip in the future.

I have also removed the 3.23 ratio diff and installed a 3.45 LSD, which has sharpened up my big girl quite well. Just need to change my speedo gear as unfortunately, when I took the car to a dyno day in October, it hit the speed limiter (112mph) prematurely leaving my power figure short. Rookie mistake as I did not think it would be an issue - my NGVB5 strategy has an AXRATIO scalar which I changed, thinking that would have the ECU covered. I was wrong. Projected power (according to the dyno operator) was around 285 rwhp. Clearly I still have some improvements to make.

Apart from having to replace head gaskets on the motor, it has been performing beautifully.

http://i1207.photobucket.com/albums/bb4 ... sideon.jpg
http://i1207.photobucket.com/albums/bb4 ... 011133.jpg


The unique 3 piece intake manifold commissioned by Ford Australia for this engine as discussed earlier in the thread.

http://i1207.photobucket.com/albums/bb4 ... 718128.jpg
http://i1207.photobucket.com/albums/bb4 ... G_0972.jpg

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to the US based tuners (and the Aussie ones on here).

Cheers
From Stu in Aus.
http://www.au2ltd.com

Australian 2002 AU2 LTD, 342ci
NGVB5 definition written by 5.0 ED. WALG Bin

Bossxr8
Regular
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:06 am

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by Bossxr8 » Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:02 am

Good stuff Stu. Removing the speed limiter in my 'Lane was one of the first things I did, because when it was dynoed in stock form I noticed peak power in 3rd was getting pretty close to the 180kph speed limiter, and when I get the 3.7's I have sitting here installed, next time its dynoed it was going to hit that well before peak power.
NVMG84 strategy 6GDC bin
97 Australian Fairlane 5.0 HO
Trickflow 11R 190's, custom FTI cam, Trickflow R manifold, 75mm accufab TB, 10.5 comp, Comp gold 1.7 rockers, K&N, pacemaker headers, magnaflow metal cats, dual 2.25 inch exhaust, hooker aerochambers, BPT underdrives, Siemans Deka 60lb injectors, Lightning 90mm MAF, 4 inch power pipe, Mustang Cobra pod airbox.
3.91 gears, LSD
Built BTR 4 speed and 3000 rpm hi stall
Moates Quarterhorse, Innovate LC1 and Binary Editor

User avatar
cgrey8
Administrator
Posts: 11304
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:54 am
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by cgrey8 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:45 am

I know this is an old thread, but I need someone's help. Earlier in this thread there are photobucket pictures of the Australian 302 intakes that are unlike anything Ford ever released here in the US. I wanted to send these pictures to someone, but I can't get access to them here at work (network nazis have Photobucket blocked). Can someone save those pictures off to their computer, then upload them as attachments to the forum so I can get at them from here? Thanks...
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com

85GT
Tuning Addict
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: NYC

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by 85GT » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:15 am

Here you go.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
85GT, 302 w/Dart Windsor Jr heads, Crane 2030 equiv. Performer 5.0, 75mm TB, 88mm slot MAF, 34lbs injectors, BBK shorties, 5spd converted to 4R70W with Baumann controller, 9" rear w/3.25s
A9L running A9P bin via Quarterhorse w/LC-1 WB

User avatar
cgrey8
Administrator
Posts: 11304
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:54 am
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by cgrey8 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:42 am

Thanks.
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com

User avatar
auIILTD
Gear Head
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by auIILTD » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:18 pm

A couple of close ups, including the lower intake.
IMG_0999.JPG
IMG_1000.JPG
IMG_1009.JPG
2012_01_05_0011.JPG
2012_01_05_0012.JPG
(please ignore that intake piping, that has long been replaced)

Hope that helps a bit more.

Cheers
Stu
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
http://www.au2ltd.com

Australian 2002 AU2 LTD, 342ci
NGVB5 definition written by 5.0 ED. WALG Bin

User avatar
cgrey8
Administrator
Posts: 11304
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:54 am
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by cgrey8 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:24 pm

While the subject has been brought back up, I have some questions.

That one trumpet with an edge broken off is that done to fit under the cover or was the intake dropped and that broke off?

Where do you get gaskets for an oddball upper/lower like this? Are they readily available or is it a special order part to get the upper/lower plenum gasket. Even if I had one of these intakes, I'm not sure I could ever find gaskets to use it here in the states.

It appears the intake is 3 pieces. The lower, the trumpeted middle that bolts to the lower. Then the upper cover. However what I'm failing to see is how the upper cover bolts to the middle piece. I see there are bolt holes around the perimeter of the middle piece. But I'm not seeing any bolt holes in the upper as it is installed in the engine bay. So I'm just curious if you have any pics of how that works.

But yes, these are great pics. Any others you have, feel free to post them as well. Stuff like this is just fascinating to know about even if it's unlikely I'll ever actually see one in person.
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com

85GT
Tuning Addict
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:32 pm
Location: NYC

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by 85GT » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:46 pm

Studs in the upper, nuts on the middle?

Hasn't any one ever made their own gaskets from a roll of gasket material? Unless there's some crazy o-ring set up, should be doable.
85GT, 302 w/Dart Windsor Jr heads, Crane 2030 equiv. Performer 5.0, 75mm TB, 88mm slot MAF, 34lbs injectors, BBK shorties, 5spd converted to 4R70W with Baumann controller, 9" rear w/3.25s
A9L running A9P bin via Quarterhorse w/LC-1 WB

User avatar
auIILTD
Gear Head
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by auIILTD » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:00 pm

cgrey8 wrote:While the subject has been brought back up, I have some questions.

That one trumpet with an edge broken off is that done to fit under the cover or was the intake dropped and that broke off?

Where do you get gaskets for an oddball upper/lower like this? Are they readily available or is it a special order part to get the upper/lower plenum gasket. Even if I had one of these intakes, I'm not sure I could ever find gaskets to use it here in the states.

It appears the intake is 3 pieces. The lower, the trumpeted middle that bolts to the lower. Then the upper cover. However what I'm failing to see is how the upper cover bolts to the middle piece. I see there are bolt holes around the perimeter of the middle piece. But I'm not seeing any bolt holes in the upper as it is installed in the engine bay. So I'm just curious if you have any pics of how that works.

But yes, these are great pics. Any others you have, feel free to post them as well. Stuff like this is just fascinating to know about even if it's unlikely I'll ever actually see one in person.
Hi,

I assume you are referring to the trumpet beside the regulator? That is shaped that way so that the cover can go on.

Ford Australia still stocks these gaskets, but are around $60 - $70 (currencies are about par at the moment), so I decided to make my own gasket - the one that you can see on the lower manifold in the picture above. These manifolds are rare. Tickford only made approximately 750 of these engines (and manifolds), so finding replacements even out here is difficult. I have heard that when they do become available, the sell for around $3K.

You are correct. The manifold is 3 pieces. The lower, the trumpet and the plenum cover. I also made the gasket for the trumpet section to the cover as this was just as expensive from Ford Australia. Once the plenum cover is mounted to the trumpet section, there are about one dozen bolts that bolt from underneath the trumpet into treaded holes in the plenum cover. Here is a picture of the underside of the plenum cover (excuse the oil everywhere, this was from a blown head gasket where I had coolant contaminating the oil):
IMG_0968.JPG
Nothing exciting, but here is the underside of the lower.
IMG_0998.JPG
.

Oh, and unrelated, Tickford reworked the GT40P heads with some larger valves:
IMG_1067.JPG
Cheers
Stu
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
http://www.au2ltd.com

Australian 2002 AU2 LTD, 342ci
NGVB5 definition written by 5.0 ED. WALG Bin

User avatar
cgrey8
Administrator
Posts: 11304
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:54 am
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by cgrey8 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:29 pm

So, its a cumbersome effort of mounting the middle on the lower. Then running bolts into the upper with the middle mounted down. Thus there better not be something in the way to keep you from getting a wrench on all the bolts that hold the upper plenum on. It certainly makes the setup look nice without bolts visible from above, but it just looks like it'd be cumbersome to work with.

The lower intake looks just like a GT40 lower from the bottom except the ports are obviously opened up as cast where anybody wanting ports that big on a factory GT40 has to do some grinding. The top obviously has the oval ports & no EGR provision so from above, the GT40 and that lower are noticeably different.

The GT40p heads with the 2.02/1.60 valves is something multiple people have done over the years, although the consensus from anybody that has done it is that the ports are the limiting factor, not the valves. So there's little return from the cost of the larger valves and machining work required to get them in. I would hope that as part of the valve increase, they also did some pocket porting.

Otherwise, it's all still fascinating. Thanks for posting those details.

BTW, the other things on the engine appear that it is from the late 90s. What year(s) were these engines made? I'm assuming this one is from 2002 (given your signature).

And what size are those blue injectors? Were they stock or are they upgrades to stock?
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com

User avatar
auIILTD
Gear Head
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by auIILTD » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:11 pm

Yes, removing the upper plenum is a right royal pain in the backside - and time consuming. Removal of the bolts is usually with an open end spanner and fingers where you can get them in there.

Correct, no EGR. Not sure what Tickford (Ford Australia's performance partner at the time) did in addition to the heads. I am sure there was some porting work involved.

These engines were modified from the stock 5.0 by Tickford in 2001 and 2002. My car only originally came with a 5.0. I sourced this engine and installed it aftermarket (when this thread started). It was originally assembled for Tickford based Ford Falcons (Common Aussie Passenger Car). Injectors are stock 24lb ones, but on these engines, a higher fuel pressure was implemented. If I recall correctly, the 5.0 ran at 250kpa, these 5.6L were at 300kpa.

I posted this previously, but here is the promo video from back then regarding this engine. 250kw = 340hp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJvUrgJla5k

Also, a website of great info for these cars is www.tseries.info When it works, check out the T3 models. Here is another example - www.aufalcon.com.au/bluedriver

Cheers
Stu
http://www.au2ltd.com

Australian 2002 AU2 LTD, 342ci
NGVB5 definition written by 5.0 ED. WALG Bin

User avatar
auIILTD
Gear Head
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:20 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by auIILTD » Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:51 am

One of the above mentioned intake manifolds has just come up on ebay. Starting bid AU$3000! I did report that they where rare.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/T3-ts50-te50 ... 27cf28916b

Cheers
Stu
http://www.au2ltd.com

Australian 2002 AU2 LTD, 342ci
NGVB5 definition written by 5.0 ED. WALG Bin

User avatar
cgrey8
Administrator
Posts: 11304
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:54 am
Location: Acworth, Ga (Metro Atlanta)
Contact:

Re: 302 to 342, what all needs to change in the tune?

Post by cgrey8 » Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:29 am

I get that unusual and rare things are often valuable. I also get that some people will pay handsomely for that uniqueness. But purely from a performance standpoint, there's no justifying that kind of price. Yet there it is...
...Always Somethin'

89 Ranger Supercab, 331 w/GT40p heads, ported Explorer lower, Crane Powermax 2020 cam, FMS Explorer (GT40p) headers, aftermarket T5 'Z-Spec', GUFB, Moates QuarterHorse tuned using BE&EA

Member V8-Ranger.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests